Just curious what the difference is between having high tip and tail heights vs rocker.
Many boards billed as all-camber have high tips that seem like they would serve to help “float” the board which I thought was the purpose of rocker; to get the tips over the snow instead of digging in.
For example, I got Spliffs this season (which in the few times I’ve ridden I was very pleased with), and was surprised to see just how little tip and tail arc there was for a board that was rockered on the ends. Comparing that to something like a DLP or my Twoowt Lions which do not have rocker but the tips are quite high, seems like they’d do well in terms of tips clearing powder.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Many boards billed as all-camber have high tips that seem like they would serve to help “float” the board which I thought was the purpose of rocker; to get the tips over the snow instead of digging in.
For example, I got Spliffs this season (which in the few times I’ve ridden I was very pleased with), and was surprised to see just how little tip and tail arc there was for a board that was rockered on the ends. Comparing that to something like a DLP or my Twoowt Lions which do not have rocker but the tips are quite high, seems like they’d do well in terms of tips clearing powder.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment