which are better? I've noticed spruces ONLY come with the releasable on risers, but there are a lot of nice non releasable bindings out there... pros and cons to both? thanks
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
releasable vs. non releasable bindings
Collapse
X
-
pros of releasable bindings:
they release
cons of releasable bindings:
they release
some people would rather not have releasable bindings because they cost a lot plus theres no real need for a releasable bindings for a board under 100 cm.
they spruce 120s can only have releasable bindgins for liability reasons.
same reason why line's new Quick Mount system is not 4x4, so people dont sue them from breaking their legs by putting non-releasable bindings on the skiis.
-
basically, if your worried about your ankles breaking, get them
if your not like most skiboarders then there is no need.
ask most skiboarders on ehre and they will say they've taken tons of falls and spills withouts breaking their legs.
Comment
Comment